Skip to main content

Website navigation

Navigation

A female actor wearing a blue boiler suit is lurking in the shadows.

1984 Education: Social, Historical and Political context

Social context: 1984 and modern-day Scotland

Modern-day Telescreens

In the world of 1984, Winston lives under constant surveillance. Telescreens are constantly watching you, while the Thought Police look for signs of rebellion. Today, surveillance is part of everyday life. CCTV cameras are common in public spaces, while phones, websites and apps can collect information about how we use technology. Body cams, door cams, and even “Meta glasses”. This development in surveillance tech within our everyday lives is an important point of discussion for us in relation to the show. This doesn’t mean that our phones are literally telescreens or that modern society is the same as Oceania. However, Orwell’s story gives us a useful way to think about privacy and surveillance.

THINK ABOUT IT: How much privacy are you willing to give up for convenience or security?

Modern-day Thought Police

The Party controls information in 1984. Winston’s job is to rewrite newspapers and historical records so that the Party is always correct. Today, we have access to more information than ever before. But having lots of information doesn’t necessarily mean we know what is true. Social media algorithms, personalised feeds, influencers, advertising and online news can all affect what information reaches us. Two people can search for the same subject and end up seeing completely different information.

Misinformation 

The Party doesn’t simply hide information. It actively creates its own version of reality. In the real world, governments, political groups, organisations and individuals can all use propaganda to influence public opinion. Today, misinformation can spread extremely quickly online. Images and videos can also be edited or generated using technology, making it increasingly difficult to know whether something we see is genuine.

This makes one of Orwell’s biggest questions particularly interesting:

If we can’t agree on what is true, how can we challenge those in power?

Weaponised Hate

The Party constantly encourages people to look for “the enemy”. Someone they can blame for the problems in society and the oppression in their world. This can be seen in the Two Minute Hate, where people are encouraged to direct their anger towards violence and anyone seen as an enemy of the Party. This idea connects to the way scapegoating can work in the real world. Scapegoating happens when a person or group is blamed for wider problems in society, often taking attention away from the systems, decisions or inequalities that have actually contributed to them.

We can see this in some political and media narratives about marginalised communities, LGBTQIA+, refugees and migrants. Where groups of people can be presented as responsible for wider social or economic problems, and in turn this blame distracts from addressing the structural issues within society.

Task: Who gets to decide what’s true?

In small groups, decide whether you agree or disagree with each statement:

  • Truth is the same for everyone.
  • If enough people believe something, it becomes true.
  • The person with the most power gets to decide what is true.
  • You can know something is true even if you have no proof.
  • It is sometimes safer to accept a lie than to challenge the truth.

Choose one statement that your group disagrees about. Can you come up with an example that supports each side? 

Then ask: Who benefits when people cannot agree on what is true? Think of scenes in the performance that support this idea. 

Listen to our section on the social context of 1984 and the task above

Historical and Political Context

To understand 1984, it helps to learn more about the world George Orwell was living in. Orwell had lived through some of the most politically extreme and violent events of the twentieth century. 1984 was published in 1949, just four years after the end of the Second World War. Europe had been devastated by war, millions of people had died, cities had been destroyed, and Britain was still dealing with food shortages, rationing and economic hardship. Orwell took many of these real experiences and pushed them to an extreme.

World War II

During Orwell’s lifetime, fascist dictatorships rose to power across Europe. Adolf Hitler ruled Nazi Germany, Benito Mussolini ruled Italy, and Francisco Franco established a dictatorship in Spain. This time in history shows us how governments can use propaganda, censorship, over-policing of marginalised communities and violence to control populations.  The London of 1984 therefore contains details that would have felt familiar to Orwell’s original readers, with the world being deliberately grey, worn-down and oppressive. This matters dramatically because the world of 1984 feels frighteningly believable rather than completely imaginary. Orwell was also writing in the aftermath of the development and use of nuclear weapons. The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 had demonstrated that humanity now could destroy on an unimaginable scale. This contributed to a widespread fear of another global conflict. In 1984, the world exists in a state of permanent war. The constant threat of conflict helps the Party maintain control because people are encouraged to believe that they are under constant attack.

Stalin and the Soviet Union

Another political and historical influence was Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union. Under Stalin, the Soviet government became increasingly authoritarian. Political opponents were removed, imprisoned or executed, while propaganda was used to create a carefully controlled image of Stalin and the state. This was referred to as “The Great Purge”.

The Great Purges of the 1930s created an atmosphere of fear and suspicion. People could be accused of being “enemies of the state”, and political “confessions” could be forced from people who had committed no real crime. Orwell was particularly critical of Stalinist totalitarianism. His experiences during the Spanish Civil War had shown him how political organisations could manipulate information and turn on their own supporters. This helps us understand ideas such as Thoughtcrime, the Thought Police, Room 101 and the Party’s destruction of Winston’s identity.

The Spanish Civil War

In 1936, George Orwell travelled to Spain to fight against fascism during the Spanish Civil War. While there, he encountered not only the conflict between fascists and anti-fascists but also the violent political divisions within the anti-fascist movement itself. Orwell was shot in the throat and narrowly survived this experience. When political repression turned against his own side, Orwell and his wife Eileen were forced to flee Spain. These experiences profoundly influenced Orwell’s distrust of political propaganda and the manipulation of truth. In 1938, he published Homage to Catalonia, a memoir detailing his experiences in Spain, in which he describes the conflict, political divisions, and propaganda he witnessed. This experience helped shape his lifelong interest in how authoritarian regimes and political movements can distort reality and control what people believe. In his novel 1984, this theme manifests as one of the Party’s most powerful weapons: if you can control the past, you can control people’s understanding of the present. Ben, our Assistant Director, dedicated a lot of time during the rehearsal process to researching the Spanish Civil War and its influence on Orwell’s writing.

The Cold War 

When 1984 was published in 1949, a major conflict was beginning: the Cold War. The alliance between Britain and the Soviet Union had broken down after the Second World War, and the world was increasingly divided between competing political and ideological powers, particularly the capitalist West and the communist Soviet Union. This atmosphere of suspicion and fear influenced the world of 1984, where Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia are locked in apparently endless conflict. The important thing is that the enemy keeps changing. One moment, Oceania is at war with Eurasia. Later, the Party claims it has always been at war with Eurasia. Winston’s job is to rewrite the records so that the new version of history appears to have always been true. If the world of 1984 is influenced by post-war Britain, what should it look and sound like? If the Party is influenced by authoritarian regimes, how might its propaganda be presented?

1984: Education
The cast on 1984 on stage

Back to 1984 education page

The 1984 education pack is here to help you dig a little deeper into 1984 and the choices behind the production. Head back to the main page to explore more.